2004 FENNER CONFERENCE ON THE ENVIRONMENT
Understanding the populationenvironment debate: Bridging disciplinary divides
The Shine Dome, Canberra, 24-25 May 2004
Opening
The Hon. Dr David Kemp MP
Minister for the Environment and Heritage
Thank you very much Professor Fenner for your kind welcome and the invitation
to open this conference on population and environment.
Before I start I would like to acknowledge your outstanding record of
academic and scientific leadership. Your role as patron of this Fenner
Conference is yet another demonstration of your dedication and long-standing
contribution to Australian science.
Governments are already grappling with issues of population and environment,
and the advice coming out of this conference will help to create sound
and effective policies and programs.
Any debate about population and the environment should recognise the
complexity of the issue. Population trends concern the number of human
beings impacting on the resource base and the ecological systems upon
which all life and wellbeing depends.
The impact of population trends will vary, depending on geographical,
distributional, technological and importantly, cultural factors. There
is no simple equation between population growth and environmental damage,
no mantra about development and environmental impact. Indeed, one of the
primary goals of policy is ecologically sustainable development
a concept which connotes the compatibility of development with the maintenance
of ecosystem functioning.
As Dr Butler stated in his June 2003 paper on Population and Environment
for the Academy, the issue of population and environment
especially when projected to the future cannot be separated from
that of sustainability.
The worst drought in a century has brought home to Australians from Albany
to Sydney the need to manage our natural resources on a long-term and
sustainable basis.
Genuine efforts to put this continent on a sustainable basis require
a rounded environmentalist impulse which recognises that no quality of
life can be maintained, and no decent community life continued, unless
we value the natural environment which supports and sustains us, and take
it into account in our decisions.
Environmental sustainability is very much at the top of the national
agenda of priorities.
Australia is a fragile land where past practices have had environmental
consequences. As we plan for the future, Australia must consider the
impact of our economic activity on our continent, especially in relation
to issues such as:
- energy;
- urban infrastructure;
- air and water quality;
- land use;
- lifestyle and its material consequences such as waste;
- the recognition of the value of the environment; and
- innovation and technology.
I would like to take a few moments to focus on the urban environment
to illustrate the nexus between the economy, society and the environment
underpinning sustainability.
In our urban centres the historical patterns of growth are changing.
Population growth on the peripheries is no longer a given as the centres
of our cities are revitalised with apartments and medium-density housing.
To some extent, there are now two opposing forces at work shaping our
urban lifestyles reurbanisation in the centre, and suburbanisation
on the outskirts. Each has its own implications for our lifestyle and
for our environment.
It is important that we identify and understand the forces encouraging
growth in the major cities if we are to anticipate future changes in population
growth and achieve a basis for sustainable cities.
Achieving a sustainably built environment will require effective partnerships
between governments, architects, engineers, landscape architects, planners,
builders and developers - partnerships that are being encouraged in 2004
by the Year of the Built Environment.
The year's events and activities are encouraging the community to appreciate
and achieve built environments that are sustainable, are practical and
provide us with an improved lifestyle. The year's activities hopefully
will provide the impetus for the community to address the challenges of
sustainable development, energy efficiency and public amenity in the years
to come.
The Year of the Built Environment builds on some real successes across
the country as a result of government action:
- Australia's national air and fuel quality standards are already delivering
cleaner air and healthier lungs. Air quality in our cities has actually
improved since 1996 and it will be cleaner still when the most recent
of the new fuel standards come into effect in 2006.
- We have paved the way for the introduction of vehicles with improved
engine technology and tighter emission controls. Cleaner fuel for cleaner
engines will help cut the major pollutants associated with respiratory
and cardiovascular diseases by up to 76 per cent in metropolitan areas
by 2015. These efforts are estimated to save the Australian community
more than $3.4 billion between 2002 and 2020 in avoided air pollution-related
health costs
- The government's $40 million Sustainable Cities initiative will, over
five years, strengthen and enforce these standards, and improve our
management of hazardous wastes and chemicals.
- Sustainable cities will make it easier for us to reduce urban water
consumption by including a national water efficiency labelling scheme
and minimum performance standards for appliances and household fittings.
Sustainable development is at the heart of the Howard government's approach,
with systems and processes in place at the highest level to enable us
to apply an integrated, whole-of-government approach to environmental
problems. The Treasurer, in his Budget speech two week's ago, identified
'sustainable development as a cornerstone of Australia's continuing prosperity'.
The environment is an equal partner to the triple bottom line, and has
a key place at the table in government's decision-making.
The Prime Minister set up and chairs the Sustainable Environment Committee
of Cabinet to ensure that environmental considerations are central to
decisions on economic growth and development. As you know, a sustainable
Australia is one of the nation's top research priorities. I am excited
by our current work on energy because it is making decisions about economic
growth and development while fully taking into account the environmental
and social angles. It is about sustainability in action.
Over the past decade, Australian governments have adopted ecologically
sustainable development principles to guide our management of the environment
and decision making. The Howard government has put sustainable development
principles into action, providing a solid foundation for sustainability
through its Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act.
The $3 billion Natural Heritage Trust and the $1.4 billion National
Action Plan for Salinity and Water Quality Australia's largest
environmental rescue programs have as their key objectives the
mobilisation of the community to achieve the sustainable use of natural
resources.
The government has invested more resources than ever before into environmental
programs: In the coming financial year, total spending by the Australian
government on the environment across all portfolios will reach a record
$2.4 billion.
At the heart of these activities has been the partnership with the Australian
community.
Industry has a process to cultivate awareness, to utilise science and
to encourage the ownership of Australia's environmental values and natural
capital.
The more people realise the economic value of our catchments in the supply
of clean water, or the costs of dryland salinity not only to agricultural
productivity but to infrastructure, the broader our pathway to a sustainable
Australia will become.
The more we account for the environmental status of our lands, waters
and air, whether through Greenhouse Gas Inventories or the National Carbon
Accounting System, the mapping of Marine Protected Areas, or regular
State of the Environment Reports, the more we become aware not only of
the issues, but also of the progress and the challenges we still face.
The more we expand our knowledge of this fragile land and apply that
knowledge to the problems we face, the more sustainable Australia will
become.
And the more we invite Australians to take ownership of these issues,
the more they will take ownership of their solutions.
So how can a conference like this one help us identify and address the
important challenges relating to population and the environment so that
we can achieve sustainability?
Recognising the complex and multidisciplinary nature of the issues is
a very good start . This conference provides an opportunity for the integration
of a whole range of disciplines and will encourage vigorous debate and
interaction between different disciplines looking at the real problem
population AND environment.
Benefits arise when different disciplines come together to share their
knowledge and expertise. Breakthroughs in understanding occur where disciplines
intersect.
The understanding of the natural world we obtain through the sciences
needs to be supplemented by the understanding of the functioning of the
economy and culture we obtain from the disciplines of economics and the
other social sciences. And while the social sciences will help us to understand
how human society handles questions of values, we will need to resort
also to the insights of philosophy to formulate the most appropriate questions
we need to answer.
I place considerable faith in innovative technology to solve some of
the physical environmental problems. But we must still face the public
policy questions of economic organisation and planning challenges to achieve
sustainability.
Our political democracy and our flexible economy give us great advantages
in the drive to sustainability. Our democracy ensures that community ownership
of the need to integrate environmental with other issues is seen as a
key requirement of a successful sustainability strategy. Our more flexible
market economy means we can more easily integrate environmental considerations
into an economic growth strategy.
While governments of all jurisdictions have been at least partly successful,
creating a sustainable Australia will require significant institutional
and individual changes. It is, essentially, a challenge that is everyone's
responsibility.
We need to consider collectively the strategic approaches necessary for
sustainable development.
We are putting in place a strategic framework to address environmental
issues of national concern. The government's aim is to achieve integrated
natural resource management across all of Australia's catchment regions
(56 in all) and throughout Australia's Exclusive Economic Zone and continental
seas by means of regional marine planning.
Across Australia, regional communities and individuals, with support
from the Australian government, are doing outstanding work to address
our environmental challenges.
How people can live on this planet sustainably and the policies needed
to encourage them to do so, is a guiding philosophy behind policies to
enlist communities in practical efforts to clean up our air and water,
use energy efficiently, economise on scarce resources, cut down on greenhouse
gas emissions, plant native vegetation to combat salinity, fish sustainably,
manage forests, encourage recycling and a range of other measures designed
to attempt to put human community and the natural environment together
sustainably.
Debates like this year's Fenner Conference are essential for ensuring
our current and future strategies to manage population and the environment
are effective.
I am delighted that this conference provides you with an opportunity
to recognise and to interact on the multidisciplinary nature of the issues.
I look forward to reading your Conference Action Plan which, I hope, will
provide some suggestions on how to manage the future challenges posed
by population and environment.
|