|
Full listing of presentations
|
|
WORKSHOP ON THE SCIENCE OF SEASONAL CLIMATE PREDICTION
The Shine Dome, 2-3 August 2006
Statistical seasonal climate forecasting in Australia: An historical overview
by Roger C Stone, Queensland Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries
Dr Roger Stone holds the positions of science leader of the Climate and Systems Technologies
research unit within the Queensland Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries and also
Associate Professor in Climatology at the University of Southern Queensland. He is also active in a
number of WMO Commissions, notably as a Rapporteur within the Commission for Climatology and
as the leader of two ‘expert teams’ within the Commission for Agricultural Meteorology. He holds a
PhD from the University of Queensland.
Scientists at the Bureau of Meteorology initiated statistical climate forecasts as early as
1910 by applying Darwin pressure (now known to be linked to the El Niño - Southern
Oscillation phenomenon) to provide a prediction of southern Australian rainfall. Although
further experimental monthly forecasts were prepared by the Bureau (based on patterns of
anticyclonicity), it was the remarkable increase in understanding of the mechanistic linkages
between the Southern Oscillation and El Niño in the late 1960s and subsequent validation of
earlier empirical analyses that led to the establishment of more scientifically acceptable seasonal
climate forecast systems in Australia and elsewhere. Simple linear, lagged, relationships
between the Southern Oscillation Index (SOI) and rainfall formed the basis of further
developments in statistical climate forecasts, whether by using multiple linear regression-based
systems or by applying slightly more sophisticated approaches such as principal component
analysis, cluster analysis, or discriminant analysis to identify more subtle patterns of SOI activity
(and rainfall patterns) over time as predictors in such schemes. Extension of such approaches,
using empirical orthogonal functions of both predictors and predictands, applied to sea-surface
temperature data formed a natural scientific progression from the earlier statistical attempts
and form the basis of most of the currently applied systems in Australia. It has been particularly
important to conduct independent verification in real time analyses and cross-validation
methods to identify any potential for ‘artificial skill’, especially where a high number of predictors
appear to provide an apparent increase in forecast skill but which, in fact, lead to a degradation
of the forecast system (eg. Nicholls, 1997). The need for more thorough understanding of the
underlying mechanisms responsible for variation in climate patterns and also climate predictors
has highlighted the value of coupled general circulation models (CGCMs) where, for example,
a 100-year integration of a CGCM on NINO4 and all-Australian rainfall produced a correlation
coefficient of -0.45 compared to the observed value of -0.53, thereby providing validity for those
approaches that apply such systems in any statistical climate forecast application (eg. Power et
al. 2005).
References
Nicholls N (1997) ‘Developments in climatology in Australia: 1946–1996’ Aust. Met. Mag. 46, 127–135.
Power S, Haylock M, Colman R, and X-Wang (2005) ‘Asymmetry in the Australian response to ENSO and
the predictability of inter-decadal changes in ENSO teleconnections’ BMRC Research Report No. 113
Australian Government Bureau of Meteorology Research Centre, Melbourne, 37pp.
|