|
Home > Media releases > 1996
TRANSCRIPT: PRIME MINISTER'S RECEPTION FOR PROFESSOR DOHERTY, NOBEL LAUREATE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH, WEDNESDAY, 6 NOVEMBER 1996, MEMBERS HALL, PARLIAMENT HOUSE
6 November 1996
Peter McGauran
Ladies and Gentlemen, Prime Minister the Honourable John Howard,
the Hon. Gareth Evans, Acting Leader of the Opposition, the Hon
John Moore, Minister for Industry Science and Tourism, Prime Ministerial,
Senatorial and House of Representatives colleagues, excellencies
and distinguished guests one and all.
Welcome and thank you for coming to this quite unique and indeed
historic event at which we honour Australia's Nobel Prize winner
for medicine,
Professor Peter Doherty. Australian scientists and all Australians
will feel enormous pride at the achievements and in the reflected
honour this brings to our country.
We also offer at this time our warmest congratulations to Dr Rolf
Zinkernagel of Switzerland, who shares this award with Professor
Doherty. As most if not all of you know, the research was carried
out at the John Curtin School of Medical Research, part of the
Australian National University's Institute of Advanced Studies
and internationally renowned for its basic research in medicine.
It is quite extraordinary that three of the four Australian Nobel
Prize Winners in Medicine have had close connections with the
John Curtin School: Howard Florey who was instrumental in setting
up the school; Sir John Eccles, Professor of Physiology there,
and now Professor Doherty.
The award recognises the long time that can occur before the knowledge
resulting from basic research is accepted and applied in the arena
of human welfare. It is only now - 20 years after this breakthrough
research of Professor Doherty, that it is coming to fruition,
so to speak.
The day after Professor Doherty was awarded his Nobel Prize, I
heard him say in an interview that he set out in his career as
a veterinary surgeon in Queensland. It therefore makes him the
only vet in history to be awarded a Nobel Prize and certainly
the only Nobel Prize Winner, he tells me, ever to conduct a post
mortem on a week old dead cow!
I think I speak on behalf of everybody when I say how grateful
we are that he decided to change vocations. Professor Doherty's
achievements are an enormous incentive to the Australian research
community and future scientists. To welcome him tonight, I call
on the Prime Minister of Australia, the Hon. John Howard.
John Howard
Thank you very much Peter McGauran, Professor Peter Doherty, Gareth
Evans, the Acting Leader of the Opposition, my other Parliamentary
Colleges and guests and particularly I acknowledge the presence
of the Ambassador for Switzerland in recognition of the partnership
of Professor Doherty with Professor Zinkernagel.
This is a small but, I hope, appropriate gesture on behalf of
the Parliament and on behalf of the Government and the people
of Australia towards a person who is only the 7th Australian to
win a Nobel Prize. Professor Peter Doherty joins the select company
of Lord Florey, Sir William Bragg,
Sir John Kornforth and Macfarlane Burnett, Sir John Eccles and
the author Patrick White, as a recipient of the Nobel Prize.
It is by any measure, both here in Australia and around the world,
a remarkable personal achievement. As a nation we are always ready
- and properly and enthusiastically so - to honour the achievements
of our men and women who bring great credit to Australia on the
playing fields and the sporting fields of the world. We are perhapsnot always so quick and so ready and eager to acknowledge the
massive contribution of people in other walks of life and other
fields of national and human endeavour.
The awarding of the Nobel Prize for Medicine to Professor Doherty
is not only an immense honour for him but it is also an immense
honour to the John Curtin School of Medical Research. The work
carried out there some 20 years ago has won them the 1996 Nobel
Prize in Medicine for physiology, and throughout its 38-year history
that school has been at the forefront of Australian and international
medical research.
The prize-winning work revolutionised immunology by finding a
key to understanding how the immune system operates and how this
can be exploited to prevent rejection of organ transplants and
in fighting cancer. It also gave immunologists an insight into
how the body's defence system identifies infective agents such
as viruses and destroys them.
It is a remarkable personal and scientific achievement. It is
a reminder to all Australians of the great store of scientific
and medical excellence that can be found in this country. One
of the three proud claims that an Australian can make is that
we have standards of medical research, of medical treatment, of
compassionate care for the ill and those who suffer life-threatening
illnesses, which are without parallel around the world.
It is with an enormous degree of personal pride on behalf of the
Government and the people of Australia that I congratulate Professor
Doherty and warmly welcome him back to his native Australia. Although
busy receiving proper recognition for his great achievement, he
is also here for the most human of all reasons, to attend his
son's wedding in Melbourne in the very near future.
We are very proud of you, Professor Doherty, for what you have
achieved. You have done the John Curtin School an immense honour,
you have done Australia an immense honour but, most importantly
of all, in keeping with the finest traditions of your own profession
and of scientific endeavour you have made a massive contribution
to relieving the suffering of mankind. You have made a great contribution
to understanding the ravages of disease and providing for an insight
into how medical sciences and other sciences may counteract this.
On everyone's behalf, I want to extend warm congratulations to
Professor Doherty and, in accordance with what is properly a bipartisan
political occasion, I would like to invite the acting Leader of
the Opposition Mr Gareth Evans to briefly support my remarks.
Gareth Evans
Thank you very much John Howard, Prime Minister, Peter McGauran
and of course our guest of honour tonight Peter Doherty.
I am absolutely delighted to be given this opportunity to add
my congratulations and that of the opposition to this magnificent
achievement by Peter Doherty.
There are quite a few things that divide this country but every
now again something happens that absolutely unequivocally unites
us and I think all of us here and around the country had more
than just a little skip of pride when that marvellous announcement
was made a few weeks ago. There is no higher honour, of course,
that can possibly be bestowed on anyone - not at least any medical
scientist - than the Nobel Prize, the Nobel Prize for Medicine.
It's the kind of achievement that offers enormous inspiration
to youngsters contemplating the kind of careers they might have.
It gives enormous sense of reward and encouragement to the fellow
members of the profession, many of whom, of course, work along
mightily in the dim lights without the opportunity to really achieve
these heights of recognition. But above all, from Australia's
point of view, a national point of view, it enables us to project
ourselves to the rest of the world as the kind of country we like
to think of ourselves as being: creative, imaginative, adventurous,
out there on the frontiers and really very much part of the international
action. There can be absolutely no better proof of being on the
mainstream path of international action, intellectually, scientifically
and in terms of human achievement, than to be the recipient of
a Nobel Prize.
So really, Peter, it's an absolutely superb achievement! One that
we all unite with the rest of the community in honouring you for
and I'd like to now ask you to come to the podium and address
us on that basis. Congratulations!
Peter Doherty
Well, thank you. This is a marvellous occasion - in fact, this
is fantastic. I can tell you it is really nice to win the Nobel
Prize. I would recommend it! People are extremely pleasant to
you. I have come from being a scientist who sits in the laboratory,
writes papers and does all the usual things that scientists do
on the international circuit to being a sort of institution.
It took us 20 years, the experiment that Rolf Zinkernagel and
I did in Canberra those many years ago, to get to this point.
It took so long in fact that we are in all the text books. When
some people are told what we did they say, 'well we already knew
that', and over the years I have become so accustomed to it that
I'd started to describe myself as part of the living fossil record
of the subject.
It is also great to see the two sides of the Australian Parliament
making the commitment that science truly is a bipartisan issue
in this country just as it is in the USA. We've recently had
a substantial increase in medical research funding through the
PBS year, through the efforts of Republican Members of Congress
and the Senate and the cooperation of the Democratic President
and I think this is the way science should be supported.
Science, and maintaining an active basic science community that
will feed on technology and new developments, is absolutely essential
for the future health and welfare of all countries. Those countries
that don't compete, that don't participate, are going to fall
behind and are going to miss out on much of what is likely be
the growth areas of the 21st century - I think much of this is
going to come from the biological-type areas.
Rolf Zinkernagel and I were young guys, we worked in a small laboratory.
We were put in a laboratory together because Rolf sings opera
and I was the only guy in the place that had any decent musical
appreciation. Science is often like that, it comes from chance
encounters between individuals. It comes from skills that one
of us has and the other complements. We built on a base that had
been built in this country over many years. The base we built
on was really put in place in Victoria, back in the 1930s in the
laboratories of Sir Macfarlane Burnett. Through those years it
was fostered at the Walter and Eliza Hall Institute, I think with
fairly small funding from Government.
Burnett, of course, won the Nobel Prize for Physiology and Medicine
in 1960 for his work on human immunological tolerance; his earlier
work had been on viruses. His people proceeded out to Canberra:
Frank Fenner, the co-author of the book Immunological tolerance,
set up a group in Canberra and this was the program that Rolf
Zinkernagel and I worked in. Frank Fenner will actually be coming
to the Nobel Prize Ceremony in Stockholm in December as my guest,
so there is a clear continuity between the two immunology Nobel
Prize winners through his service.
I didn't expect to win the Nobel Prize when I was growing up in
the outer suburbs of Brisbane. I went to public schools and I
wasn't a particularly good student. My best subjects were literature.
I only went to the veterinary school because I was totally confused.
I had been simultaneously reading
Jean Paul Sartre, Ernest Hemingway and Aldous Huxley and I was
in a complete mess, I can tell you. In fact, I was the man of
action rather than the man of ideas. I followed Hemingway, so
to speak - going out in those vast rural areas and all the rest
of it.
By the time I had finished veterinary school I was convinced I
wanted to do research. I had some leanings in that direction because
I was inspired by a cousin of mine Ralph Doherty, who is quite
a recognised research worker.
I wanted to do research, so the agriculture department that had
paid for my scholarship sent me to the bush where I encountered
that which the Minister spoke of. I switched to medical research,
I was no longer in the field, I was working in the laboratory,
and so we eventually came to do this work in Canberra and my career
has gone on from there.
I didn't expect ever to be living in Tennessee, but that is where
the money is and the resources are to maintain my program in a
big way. However, it is great to be here and I am pleased to be
at this occasion with so many of my scientific colleagues and
friends and to see the Australian Parliament recognising the Australian
scientific community. This has been a fantastic community of
dedicated people which has done an enormous amount in this country
in a very efficient and cost-effective way.
Australian science is extremely cost-effective. I think the return
for the dollar is better than it is anywhere else that I know.
The Nobel Prize has only come from this discovery, and they don't
come very often. You have to be lucky. I was lucky, but there
are a lot of people in this room who are just as good scientists
as I am - or better in some cases, I believe. What more can I
say? Thank you very much.
|