Looking down the track at very fast trainsAustralia still awaits a government decision on a very fast train link between our major cities. Worldwide, the debate continues about the merits of different kinds of very fast train.
Key text
Key textAustralian trains are plodders. It takes the Indian-Pacific 18½ hours to travel between Sydney and Broken Hill, a distance of 1100 kilometres (at an average speed including stops of 60 kilometres per hour). Even the country's fastest train, the XPT, takes just over 4 hours to travel from Sydney to Canberra (310 kilometres).Some people say we should use 'tilt' trains, which are faster than current Australian trains (but still slow by world standards) and can use existing tracks (Box 1: The centrifugal effect and tilt trains). But most train enthusiasts know that when it comes to real speed, there are only two contenders: the current crop of 'very fast trains' that have wheels and run on steel tracks; and the more imaginative magnetically levitated trains, which excite the mind but are yet to be tested commercially. How fast is very fast? The fastest trains in commercial operation today are the French train à grande vitesse (TGV), the Japanese shinkansen  (or bullet train) and the German InterCity Express  (ICE). The TGV routinely travels at 300 kilometres per hour through the French countryside and has been clocked at 515 kilometres per hour in test runs. The bullet train averages 262 kilometres per hour between stations and has recorded 443 kilometres per hour in test runs, while the ICE has a top operational speed of 280 kilometres per hour and has recorded 408 kilometres per hour in trials. These trains have several things in common:
Let's look at one of the most successful of these trains, the TGV, in slightly more detail. Innovations in the TGV Many of the innovative aspects of the TGV are in the design and placement of bogies. Bogies consist of two or more pairs of wheels, their axles and a connecting frame that supports the carriages (usually called cars) above. At high speeds, the vibrations produced by contact between the wheels and the rails increase dramatically. This can cause the bogies to sway from side to side, which in turn can damage the track and, in severe cases, derail the train. While developing the TGV, engineers found that increasing the distance between axles in the bogies could reduce this instability. In addition, since instability increased with increasing bogie weight, they moved the electric motors, usually mounted on the bogies, and suspended them from the bottom of the cars. Bogie placement was also changed. Conventional train carriages have two bogies each, one towards each end. In the TGV, cars are attached to each other semi-permanently, with the front end of one car and the back end of the next car resting on a common bogie. In this way, each car effectively uses only one bogie (two halves). Efforts are continually being made to reduce the overall weight of the train, largely because the lighter the train, the less stress there is on the track (therefore lowering maintenance costs). Reducing the number of bogies saves weight. In addition, new, lighter materials are used in the construction of the trains. Even the seats are now made of lightweight carbon fibres, magnesium and composite materials. Wheels on tracks or levitated While the TGV, the bullet train and the ICE all use established technology electric motors and steel wheels revolutionary technology has produced a high speed train which floats on a magnetic cushion of air above a special track. Maglev The maglev differs radically from its more conventional high-speed cousins. It doesn't have wheels and it doesn't run on a steel track. It doesn't even have an on-board motor. The motor that propels the maglev is in the special track, and the propulsion comes from magnets. In maglev technology, electromagnets (devices that become magnetic when fed an electric current) are mounted on the train and in the track (usually called a guideway). The electromagnets levitate, guide and propel the train along the guideway (Box 2: How the maglev works). Maglev vs conventional high speed trains Maglev technology has several theoretical advantages over conventional high-speed trains. Since there is no wheel-to-track contact, less energy is lost due to friction and the trains create less noise. Maglevs also use less energy to achieve the same speed as conventional very fast trains. In addition, since the motor is in the guideway rather than on the train, it is possible to increase its power on steep sections. This means that maglevs can climb steeper grades than conventional high-speed trains, reducing the need for tunnels. Despite such advantages, maglevs remain commercially unproven. In comparison, trains like the TGV, the bullet train and the ICE have been formidably successful. Millions of people have travelled on them; hundreds of thousands use them each day. Each new generation of train gets faster, and they boast an impressive safety record. One of the biggest barriers to maglevs is the need for a whole new infrastructure. Their guideways need to be constructed from scratch, a costly and financially risky venture, at least in the early stages. In contrast, conventional high-speed trains can run on existing tracks through urban areas, and the high-speed portions can be constructed in stages. Safety of very fast trains Very fast trains are safe compared to most other forms of motorised transport. For example, the TGV, which commenced operation in 1981, travels about 10 million passenger kilometres each year. It is yet to have an on-board fatality, although a number of people have died in collisions at road crossings. But this is not to say that major disasters are impossible. In June 1998, an InterCity Express, travelling at about 200 kilometres per hour, derailed near Eschede in Germany, killing 102 people and injuring hundreds more. The cause of the accident is still under investigation. The future of high speed trains Commentators seem to agree that very fast trains the conventional ones, at least will form a significant part of the international transportation scene in coming decades. But Australia is something of a special case. With our small population dispersed in relatively small towns and middle-sized cities across vast distances, the commercial viability of very fast trains remains in doubt. There is no shortage of ideas: some people talk of a high-speed train network linking Melbourne to Brisbane (via Canberra), and another, linking Melbourne and Darwin, has also been proposed. Are we on the cusp of a transport revolution in Australia, or are our trains destined to remain plodders? Should we launch straight into technology, or should we consider the tried-and-true alternatives? Expect the debate to continue, full steam ahead.
Similar things will happen if a train takes a bend too fast. Standing passengers will lurch over and luggage may fall down from racks. If the centrifugal effect is strong enough (and it has to be very strong), the train itself might fall off the tracks. Smoothing out the bends Train companies wish to avoid disturbing their customers with centrifugal effects, so they adopt strategies for 'smoothing' out the bends and corners that a train inevitably has to take. The centrifugal effect is proportional to the square of the velocity of the train and inversely proportional to the radius of the bend in the track. This means that if you want to double the velocity of the train but keep centrifugal effects constant, you must increase the radius of the bend four-fold. Tilting the train Another strategy for coping with centrifugal effects is to tilt the train itself this is used, for example, by the Swedish X2000 series that can travel up to 200 kilometres per hour. If the train is tilted, and with it all the tables, seats and passengers, then the tendency for everything to slide down this slope can exactly balance the centrifugal tendency for them to move towards the outer wall of the carriage, and everything feels normal. The actual tilting of the train is done by pivoting individual carriages on their bogies using pistons. The pistons are controlled by computer and move up or down depending on the strength of centrifugal effect. By counteracting the centrifugal effect in this way, 'tilt' trains can travel up to 40 per cent faster around curves than conventional trains. Tilting technology was tried in Australia on the Sydney-Canberra line for a 2-month period in 1995. A trip that usually takes 4 hours and 5 minutes on the XPT was reduced to 3 hours and 25 minutes, a timesaving of about 16 per cent. A new tilt train service is to be introduced later this year between Brisbane and Rockhampton. The service should reduce travelling time from 9.5 hours to 7 hours. Related sites
Levitating the maglev The attraction or repulsion of electromagnets is used to levitate a maglev. On one breed of maglevs, the Transrapid, levitation magnets fitted to the train are attracted to support magnets on the underside of the guideway. A computer-controlled system ensures that the vehicle levitates via this attractive force at a constant distance from its guideway. In other words, the two magnets attract each other and thus lift the carriage, but the attraction is not strong enough so that the two magnets make contact with each other. The train therefore 'floats', making no physical contact with the guideway. Some other types of maglev use the repelling force of magnets with the same polarity to levitate the train. In all types, guidance magnets ensure that the train remains at the appropriate distance from the vertical edge of the guideway. Propelling the maglev Electromagnets also propel maglev trains. A series of electromagnets are laid out in a line along the guideway and electromagnets are installed on the train. An electromagnet on the guideway pulls a train magnet towards it because it has an opposite polarity. As the train passes over the guideline magnet, the polarity of the magnet is reversed so it matches that of the train magnet, thus repelling the train magnet. As the train hurtles along, the electromagnets in the guideway switch on and off and reverse polarity as required. Electric current activates the guideway electromagnets only when the train passes over them. Related sites
New Scientist 22 September 2006 Maglev train crash highlights high-speed risk (by Will Knight) Looks at the dangers of maglev trains.
8 January 2005, page 26 2005 preview: China pushes ahead with levitating trains Looks at the future of magnetic levitation passenger trains.
8 August 1998, page 7 Prepare for lift off (by Duncan Graham-Rowe) A new maglev system uses permanent magnets and a novel linear motor.
11 July 1998, page 18 Silent but speedy (by Jonathan Beard) Reports on a new type of train track which is longer lasting, less noisy and cheaper to maintain.
Scientific American January 2000, pages 64-69 Maglev: A new approach (by Richard F. Post)
October 1997, pages 68-73 How high-speed trains make tracks (by Jean-Claude Raoul)
October 1997, pages 74-76 Fast trains: Why the US lags (by Anthony Perl and James A. Dunn Jr.)
October 1997, page 77 Maglev: Racing to oblivion? (by Gary Stix)
September 1995, page 74-75 High-speed rail: Another golden age? (by Tony R. Eastham)
August 1992, page 83-93 Air trains (by Gary Stix)
Describes a variety of very fast trains, including maglevs and tilt trains.
The TGVweb (European Railway Server) 'Introduction' includes background information, history of the TGV before
1981 and frequently asked questions. 'The future TGV' includes recent
TGV research and development.
Australian very fast trains a chronology (Australian Parliamentary Library)
Outlines the various proposals to build high speed rail lines in Australia.
polarity. Describes a situation in which there are opposing physical properties at different points in an object or system. When this refers to magnetic poles, the two opposite poles are called ‘North’ and ‘South’; when it refers to electric charges, the two opposite properties are called positive and negative. Unlike poles (and charges) attract; like poles (and charges) repel. transformer. A device consisting of two coils of wire wound on a soft iron core which is used to change the voltage of an alternating current. Transformers can either increase the voltage (a step-up transformer) or decrease the voltage (a step-down transformer). TV receivers have a step-up transformer that increases the voltage enough to operate the picture tube, and also a step-down transformer to reduce the supply voltage (240 volts) to the 5 volts needed to run transistors.
External sites are not endorsed by the Australian Academy of Science. Posted October 1998. The Australian Foundation for Science is also a supporter of Nova. This topic is sponsored by the Australian Government's National Innovation Awareness Strategy.
|