|
Full listing of papers
Ian Lowe is now an emeritus professor at Griffith University, where he was previously Head of the School of Science. He directed the Commission for the Future in 1988 and chaired the advisory council that produced the first national report on the state of the environment in 1996. He was named Australian Humanist of the Year in 1988 and delivered the 1991 Boyer Lectures for the ABC. In 2000 he received the Queensland Premier's Millennium Award for Excellence in Science and the Prime Minster's Environmental Award for Outstanding Individual Achievement. He writes a weekly column for New Scientist.
|
|
SCIENCE AT THE SHINE DOME 2002: ANNUAL SYMPOSIUM
Transition to sustainability
3 May 2002
What
would a sustainable city or community look like?
by Professor Ian Lowe
Introduction
Resources
Environmental issues
Social questions
Economic issues
The knowledge base
A HEALTHIER future
Sustainable community
Introduction
The 1996 State of the
Environment report concluded that progress toward sustainable development
requires integrating ecological thinking into all social and economic planning.
A recent study by Raskin et al. encourages the belief that a transition to a
future sustainable society is entirely possible; it concludes that the 'great
transition' is technically feasible, economically achievable, and clearly
socially preferable to the alternative. The modelling shows that the transition
will only occur if there is political will and purposive action, based ideally
on a vision of a future sustainable society, or at least on an understanding of
which present activities are not sustainable and need to be changed. The
analysis also concludes that the transition will not be any easy one. Even with
fundamental shifts in desired lifestyles, values and technology, it will
take decades to make poverty obsolete, realign human activity with a healthy
environment and ameliorate the deep fissures which divide the human family.
Resources
In resource terms, a sustainable society will have made a
fundamental transition from the current energy system, which transforms fossil
hydrocarbons inefficiently into a range of energy services, to a new regime
based on efficient conversion of natural flows of energy from the sun, wind,
the Earth's internal heat, natural water movements and biomass. It will also be
using its productive land sustainably, probably producing less food and fibre
than we do in 2002. Strategic decisions will have been taken to reserve key
mineral deposits for applications which enhance our capacity to meet other
goals; for example, lead will be used as plates of batteries rather than in applications
which irrecoverably dissipate the metallic atoms, such as paints or fuel
additives. More efficient water use in homes, factories and on farms will have
reduced demand to levels that can be sustained. Several studies have shown that
improvements in resource efficiency of at least a factor of four can be
achieved now, using technology that is economically viable today, while it is
reasonable to expect that future technological development will allow further
gains.
Environmental issues
A future sustainable community will
have stabilised both the size of the human population and the environmental
pressures resulting from its lifestyle choices. It will have stopped destroying
natural areas for expansion and required developments to be biodiversity-positive.
It will have curbed its emissions of pollutants into the air and water by
achieving the goal of becoming a zero-waste society, in which products are
routinely reused or their materials recycled at the end of their useful life.
Legislation in the European Union and Japan has already moved well down the
path toward these goals. The switch to clean energy supply technologies and
dramatically improved conversion efficiency will have reduced carbon dioxide
emissions to about 10 per cent of the 2002 level. Changes to both vehicle
technology and the scale of urban transport will have removed from urban air
the human contribution to the precursors of photochemical 'smog'. As discussed
below, the goal of meeting our needs without damaging our environment will have
been achieved through a large investment in understanding complex natural
systems and our effects on them.
Social questions
A sustainable
community of the future will have promoted equity by its social policies and by
rejecting the recent rush to embrace global markets. It will have become more
socially secure by promoting a more equitable distribution of wealth. It will
have become more healthy by encouraging better diet and more exercise, notably
by providing the facilities that make it safe to walk or cycle short distances.
It will have developed a new and durable cultural or spiritual basis, probably
based on having regained respect for the natural world. A sense of community
will have been developed by conscious policies, such as encouraging the sharing
of such facilities as pools and laundries. It will have developed structures
and processes that respect and sustain cultural diversity.
Economic issues
A future
sustainable community will have a secure economic base, produced by using natural
resources sustainably and in innovative ways to produce goods and services
which are in demand. It will be economically secure as a result of having
invested heavily in the education and skills development of its workforce and
the level of innovation in its commercial sector. While the details of its
economic organisation are not clear at this stage, a sustainable community will
need to have developed a steady state economics rather than basing its economic
organisation on the unattainable goal of perpetual growth. Advances in economic
analysis will have made it possible for prices of goods and services to include
social and environmental costs.
The knowledge base
Achieving the
goal of sustainability will require a significant investment in improving our
understanding of the complex interactions between social and natural systems.
Just as much of the damage done to natural systems in the past has been done
through ignorance, we are still doing needless damage through our lack of
understanding. A future sustainable society will have developed a much better
understanding of complex natural systems and the effects on them of human
activity. Most importantly, this will have involved the development of detailed
understanding of the links between global processes and local variables. This
will involve working closely with people who know the land, land-holders and
indigenous people.
A HEALTHIER future
The characteristics needed can be
summed up by the acronym of a HEALTHIER future society. The HEALTHIER future is one that is Humane, has an Ecocentric Approach and
a Long Time Horizon, is Informed, Efficient and Resourced.
It will be Humane in the
sense of being committed to the development of technologies and social
approaches that can be extended in principle to the entire human population,
rather than being limited to a privileged minority in a minority of countries.
This is an enormous challenge to a world in which the number of people with
access to the internet is smaller than the number of people without clean
drinking water, and in which half the human population have never made a
telephone call or ridden in a car. It will have an Ecocentric Approach
because it will recognise that our future is bound up with the future of the
natural systems of the planet, its biodiversity and its ecological integrity,
so it will have accepted that social and economic planning need to be ecologically
rational and cognisant of the limits of natural systems. Again, this
represents a fundamental change from the assumption that economic progress will
allow any environmental problem to be solved. It will have a Long Time Horizon,
recognising that our decisions have impacts stretching many decades into the
future; it will routinely ask what its choices will look like in fifty
or a hundred years, rather than being obsessed with this year's budget outcome
or next year's election. Ideally, it also should have a vision of future
development on a longer time scale. It will be Informed because it will have invested enough effort in
sustainability science to be aware of the likely impacts on natural systems of
alternative policy options. It will be more Efficient in its use of resources and energy because much of the
technology we use today is still alarmingly primitive, from the light bulb to
the car, and is both wasteful of resources and needlessly damaging to the
environment. As argued above, efficiency improvements of at least a factor of
four are now in prospect, but the long-term goal must be at least a factor of
ten if the legitimate material expectations of the developing world are to be
met at acceptable environmental cost.
Finally, it will be Resourced
because we will have planned ahead for smooth transitions away from those
resources which are running short (most obviously oil) to those which are
abundant (most obviously solar energy and its derivatives). It is not clear at
this stage what mix of energy supply technologies will be used to power the
future sustainable society, though the most likely approach is hydrogen fuel
cells for transport and a variety of large-scale renewable energy options for
both electricity and production of the hydrogen used for transport.
Sustainable community
Achieving the goal of
sustainability requires a fundamental change of course. We need to take account
of the resource demands of our choices, to be aware of the impacts on natural
systems through investing heavily in improving our understanding of those
impacts, and to take the hard decisions in our personal and professional lives
that will produce communities which are sustainable in social terms. A
sustainable future society is technically possible, economically feasible and
socially desirable, but we need the political will to manage the transition.
Our science gives us better understanding than ever before of the natural world
and our impacts on it. Our technology gives us unprecedented capacity to change
the world to meet our needs and suit our desires. Our humanity requires us to
use that scientific understanding and that technological capacity to develop a
sustainable society. That is our moral responsibility to future generations, as
well as to the other species with which we share the planet.
|